data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e3cb/5e3cb5c04b140b631ac409325f5ed8ea315cb0c5" alt="" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63893/63893e46b8307bd215052a5751b2d334cc99ba2d" alt="" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e61e1/e61e1720cb3bcd806b19abe91c80e681ae17b700" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd0b3/fd0b352754ff0a2baa1d7c02cf589b3f06959577" alt="Probability"
Suppose
that being over 7 feet tall indicates with 60% probability that someone
is a basketball player, and carrying a basketball indicates this with 72%
probability. If you see someone who
is over 7 feet tall and carrying a basketball, what is the probability
that they're a basketball player?
If a and b are
the probabilities associated with two independent pieces of evidence,
then combined they indicate a probability of:
ab
-------------------
ab + (1 - a)(1 - b)
So in this case our answer is:
(.60)(.72)
-------------------------------
(.60)(.72) + (1 - .60)(1 - .72)
which is .794. There is a 79.4% chance that the person is a basketball player.
When there are more than two pieces of evidence, the formula expands
as you might expect:
abc
---------------------------
abc + (1 - a)(1 - b)(1 - c)
In the case of spam filtering, what we want to calculate is the probability
that the mail is a spam, and the individual pieces of evidence
a, b, c, ... are the
spam probabilities associated with each of the words in the mail.
For a good explanation of the background, see:
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath267.htm.
|
|